Home Page

Prison Contact Information

Pelican Bay History

Family and Friends

Donny's Page

Features/News

Pen Pal Ads

Links

Contact Us

Pelican Bay Prison Project

Features Archive 2005

2006 Features | 2005 Features | More 2005 | Last 2005 | 2004 Features


State Bureau to Monitor Inmate Death Probe
Published: September 13, 2005

By Matt Mais

Triplicate staff writer


The Office of the Inspector General's Bureau of Independent Review will be monitoring the investigation into the homicide that occurred last week inside Pelican Bay State Prison.

Inmate Lloyd Avery was murdered Sept. 4, but his body sat inside his cell in the prison's general population facility for two days before correctional officers discovered he was dead.

"Anytime that there is any indication that there is administrative or criminal investigation into wrongdoing by a staff member we are called out," said Brett Morgan, acting spokesman for the Bureau of Independent Review.

Morgan said the overall investigation is being headed up by the
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. His agency is monitoring the probe.

Morgan said he could not comment on the investigation, but he said the bureau will be monitoring it all the way through.

A representative from the bureau flew from Sacramento to Crescent City on Friday and visited the prison. He left Tuesday, Morgan said.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokeswoman Terry Thornton said the department would not comment on what its own investigators have learned about why Avery's body was not discovered sooner.

"I cannot comment on that right now," Thornton said. However, Thornton said Avery's cellmate, Kevin Roby, 41, is the primary suspect in the murder.

Roby, is serving a life sentence for murder, she said.
Avery was also serving a life sentence for murder, prison officials said.

According to Del Norte County Sheriff and Coroner Dean Wilson, Avery died of strangulation and a blow to the head sometime on the evening of Sept. 4. His body was discovered at 11:55 a.m. on Sept. 6.

The death of Avery, 36, was the 16th murder to occur inside Pelican Bay since the maximum security prison opened in December of 1989.

The last homicide there occurred on May 27, 2004, according to prison officials

Pelican Bay State Prison is a maximum security state prison designed to house the state's most serious criminals.

Prisoners in the general population facility are supposed to be
counted at least four times a day by guards, officials said.

They are also seen twice a day when they are fed by officers,
according to Rick Newton, president of the Pelican Bay chapter of the California Correctional Peace Officers Association.

"It's a difficult situation because there are numerous officers
involved," Newton said.

"The whole issue is pending investigation. What we're hoping is that the investigation will give us more light into what occurred," Newton said. He declined further comment.

Pelican Bay spokesman Steve Perez also declined to comment regarding the apparent breakdown.


Friday, July 1, 2005 (SF Chronicle)

U.S. seizes state prison health care/Judge cites preventable deaths of inmates, 'depravity' of system
James Sterngold, Chronicle Staff Writer


A federal judge, saying he was acting urgently to stop the needless deathsof inmates because of medical malfeasance, ordered Thursday that areceiver take control of California's prison health care system and correct what he called deplorable conditions.

Experts said the order by U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson of San Francisco was unprecedented in its scope given that the prison system provides health care to roughly 164,000 inmates at an annual cost of $1.1 billion.

The order also was an embarrassing blow for the administration of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, which has promised to deliver major medical reforms for nearly two years but, Henderson said, has utterly failed.

The prison medical system offered "at times outright depravity, and I intentionally call it that," said Henderson.

He also said the need for action was so dire that he might appoint a temporary receiver in just weeks to at least begin to limit the harm to inmates from the poor medical care before a permanent receiver is put in place.

Inmate families and those who have long fought for change in the prisons were ebullient.

"It's certainly everything we asked for," said Donald Specter, head of the Prison Law Office, the prisoner rights group that filed the suit on which the judge was acting.

Henderson said he would begin the process of selecting a receiver and defining his or her powers in consultation with state officials and the inmates' lawyers.

The decision followed weeks of testimony from medical experts that Henderson described as horrifying in its depiction of barbaric medical conditions in some prisons, resulting in as many as 64 preventable deaths of inmates a year and injury to countless others.

The state's attorneys have never even bothered to fight those
characterizations or the need for federal intervention in spite of their damning reflection on prison managers.

"This is humiliating," said James Jacobs, a law professor at New York University and an expert on court intervention in prison management. "What's extreme here is, it's like the judge is saying to the state, 'I'm totally giving up on you -- you are unwilling or unable to do this on your own.' "

Indeed, top prisons officials for months have admitted the department was incapable of administering the system, a massive and complex medical program stretching the length of the state, often in remote locations. The state's lawyers have focused principally on trying to limit the power of the receiver.

"Nobody can do this by themselves," said Bruce Slavin, the prison system's general counsel. "A receiver can help us do what we want to do faster. "

The unions representing prison health workers, who have been at war with the prisons department, in part over who was responsible for conditions in the prisons, said they were thrilled at the judge's decision. The unions had jointly filed a brief in favor of the appointment of a receiver.

"All the unions are more than willing to work with the receiver," said Gary Robinson, the executive director of the Union of American Physicians and Dentists. "We think the department is incapable of the reforms that are necessary. The judge's position is absolutely correct. The management
has been incompetent." Michael Jacobson, the director of the Vera Institute of Justice and the former head of New York City's jails, said the receiver should begin a process of deep changes reaching into all levels of management and the
culture inside the prisons.

"Nothing is going to happen for some years," he said. "This has to be a catalyst for longer-term structural changes. The potential implications of this are just so humongous."

Henderson said appointing a receiver was a last resort but was a result of the Schwarzenegger administration's refusal to comply with his orders to improve the appalling quality of prison medical care. A federal injunction has been in place for three years requiring phased-in medical improvements at each state prison, but the Corrections Department has met none of the
goals.

In one case described by court-appointed experts, an inmate's spine was injured in a fight. A prison doctor refused to believe the inmate's claim that he couldn't move, and the doctor wrenched the inmate's head and nec during the examination, aggravating his paralysis. In a case at San Quentin in January, an inmate reported to the infirmary seeking emergency
treatment with signs of shock. A doctor already under investigation for two previous suspicious deaths prescribed antibiotics for what he said was bronchitis. When the inmate collapsed on the way back to his cell, the guards brought him back. The doctor ordered that the inmate be given intravenous fluids, but when the staff could not find a vein, the inmate
was simply returned to his cell. The inmate died the next day from a serious lung ailment.

He indicated that the receiver was likely to have the ability, at the least, to fire incompetent doctors and hire quickly to fill the more than 150 positions that have been vacant for years and to order construction to improve conditions in the state's 33 prisons.

"This is no panacea," said Jacobs. "It's a staggeringly large job."

Henderson was clear that the process is likely to be long and arduous because of the depth of the problems. In spite of condemning inco mpetent doctors described in earlier testimony, Henderson went out of his way to praise the rank-and-file prison health workers while excoriating prison
managers.

"It's also become apparent that the state has no effective management structure to offer health care," Henderson said.
He added later in his comments from the bench, "My decision to establish a receivership is just a start."

What happened
A U.S. district judge found that substandard medical care violated prisoners' rights and has led to unnecessary injuries and deaths in California prisons. He agreed to appoint an administrator to take over the health care system.

What it means
The administrator will answer to the court, not the Schwarzenegger administration, and will have the power to order improvements regardless of how much it costs state taxpayers.

What's next
Prisoner rights advocates and prison officials will recommend candidates to take control of health care programs. The judge will have the final say. The judge also may appoint a temporary receiver until a permanent appointee is named.

The numbers
164,000: Approximate number of inmates at 33 state prisons.
$1.1 billion: What state will spend this year on prison health care. 64: The number of inmates who may be dying unnecessarily in state prisons each year because of poor medical care, according to court-appointed physician Michael Puisis.

E-mail James Sterngold at jsterngold@sfchronicle.com
Copyright 2005 SF Chronicle


From The New York Times

Nation's Inmate Population Increased 2.3 Percent Last Year
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: April 25, 2005


WASHINGTON, April 24 (AP) - The nation's prisons and jails held 2.1 million people in mid-2004, 2.3 percent more than the year before, the government reported on Sunday.

The inmate population increased by slightly more than 48,000 from mid-2003 to mid-2004, a growth of about 900 inmates each week, according to the latest figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

The total inmate population has hovered around two million for the last few years: It was 2.1 million on June 30, 2002, and just below that mark a year later.

While the crime rate has fallen over the last decade, the number of people going to prison and jail is outpacing the number of inmates released, said an author of the report, Paige M. Harrison.

Ms. Harrison said the increase could be largely attributed to get-tough policies enacted in the 1980's and 1990's. Among them are mandatory sentences for drug crimes, "three strikes and you're out" laws for repeat offenders and "truth in sentencing" laws that restrict early releases.

"As a whole, most of these policies remain in place," Ms. Harrison said. "These policies were a reaction to the rise in crime in the 80's and early 90's."

Malcolm Young, executive director of the Sentencing Project, which promotes alternatives to prison, said, "We're working under the burden of laws and practices that have developed over 30 years that have focused on punishment and prison as our primary response to crime."

Mr. Young said many of those incarcerated were not serious or violent offenders, but low-level drug offenders. He said ways to help lower that number included introducing drug treatment programs that offer effective ways of changing behavior and providing appropriate assistance for the mentally ill.

The Justice Policy Institute, which advocates a more lenient system of punishment than incarceration, said the United States had the highest rate of incarceration in the world, followed by Britain, China, France, Japan and Nigeria.

According to the government's report, there were 726 inmates for every 100,000 United States residents on June 30, 2004, compared with 716 a year earlier. Put another way, in 2004, one in every 138 residents was in prison or jail; the previous year it was one in every 140.

In 2004, nearly 60 percent of prison and jail inmates were racial or ethnic minorities, the report said. An estimated 12.6 percent of all black men age 25 to 29 were in jails or prisons, compared with 3.6 percent of Hispanic men and 1.7 percent of white men in that age group, the report said.


LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSSION INDEPENDENT
REVIEW PANEL

(Statement of Judge Steve White, former Inspector General)

INTRODUCTION

Senator Jackie Speier before the Little Hoover Commission on January 27th, 2005, concerning the reorganization plan of the California Department of Corrections.

“One year ago this week in this building, Judge Steve White, the former Inspector General, testified at a joint hearing chaired by myself and Senator Romero. His testimony sent a chill through the room that day. I would like to read to you part of his statement:

(Judge Steve White):

I’ve had a lot of contact with the Department of Corrections for more than thirty years. I’ve been in every prison. Most of the prisons I’ve been in many times. During those times I have spent literally hundreds of hours collectively talking with staff and inmates in the yards, in the SHU (Security Housing Unit for prisoners deemed to have behavior problems that prevent them from being housed with the general population*), in death row – everywhere.

I’ve been to Board of Prison Terms hearings. I’ve been to every CYA (California Youth Authority) facility similarly and frequently … I’ve been to virtually any format and kind of meeting in the Department of Corrections having to do with issues of leadership and management; not by any means on a comprehensive basis but in and out, and the same thing with CYA. I’ve been in agency meetings. I’ve been to the Governor’s office. I’ve been in the Legislature in respect to this overall subject area. And so, I have a fairly comprehensive, but by no means encyclopedic, grasp of the problem … I’ve touched many parts of the elephant – as many, perhaps, as anybody around – but I don’t profess to know everything about it.

But I offer you this: The Department of Corrections is symbolic of a larger problem … And that problem is this: It’s an immense organic entity, and there’s no center to it. It has no leadership. It has no structure that stands on principle. I has an organization that doesn’t work, except in ad hoc and informal and let’s make it go away that have been largely managed on local levels – that is to say in the respective prisons – by virtue of collaboration between the wardens and the CCPOA (the California Correctional Peace Officers Association*, aka the prison guards union). To a lesser extent, it is managed – to the extent that word even applies – at the head-quarters level, also in collaboration with the CCPOA.

*Editor’s Note: “Behavior” is not the factor that prevents prisoners from being housed with G.P. Being labeled a gang member or associate gets a prisoner an indeterminate SHU Program – independent of behavior.

The CCPOA has come in for a great deal of criticism, much of it deserved. But having said that, I’m mindful of this: the CCPOA has a mission of its own, and it has a fairly narrow scope. The Department has a very large mission. It’s statutory and it’s constitutional. It’s a very wide scope. The CCPOA has managed, through its leadership talents, it’s ability to amass political monies, and it’s sheer competence – they know what they’re doing – to move the department off its larger comprehensive role and refocus the department on the CCPOA’s ground. And so, the battles that occur – to the extent they’re battles and not resolutions at the bargaining table – are on the CCPOA’s turf. They’re on the CCPOA’s agenda. CCPOA drives it. And I think that a metaphor you could look to would be a billiard table. There’s a ball on that table that’s the Legislature, and there’s a ball on that table that’s the Administration, and that Administration includes the Governor’s Office and YACA (Youth & Adult Correctional Agency), and it includes the Department of Corrections and CYA and so forth. And there’s another ball on that table that’s the CCPOA, and it’s the biggest ball on the table, and it beats those other balls back and forth across the felt. It does that on a pretty regular basis**.

Then what happens on occasions such as we’re here today – and I’ve seen these occasions before, as have many of the people in the audience, as have the Members (of the Legislature) – there gets to be a great deal of focus on this subject. And this one is, I think, one of the best such focussed forums because it has the benefit of the Special Master John Hagar’s report, and it has the benefit of two Senators who have given a great deal of attention to this and now, over a period of about a year-and-a-half, have achieved a great level of information and expertise on the subject, so it’s not something that can be easily glossed over when witnesses appear.

But having said all of that, what will happen, unless you do something different than what normally is done in the wake of these events, is that there will be great focus, there will be great saber rattling, there will be sincere commitments from Members here, there will be sincere - or at least ostensibly sincere – commitments from the people who are witnesses before you. Heads will roll, butts will get kicked, and three months later, when you’re not looking, it will be back the way it was. I know this to be a certainty.

* Editor’s Note: A mischaracterization: 90 percent of staff and the Administration are required (3) to be CCPOA dues-paying members.

** Editor’s Note: As all of these balls are bounced around prisoners are caught in the middle of the chaos and bear the brunt of it.

(Senator Jackie Speier):

“This plan, on the surface, creates the specter of a strong centrealized management system. But the plan does not alter the Unit 6 contract (the contract between the prison guards and the State) and therefore, I believe the plan will ultimately fail. The plan is like the agency’s much touted zero tolerance policy on the code of silence. It looks good on paper. But the policy effectively died when 35 officers pled the Fifth Amendment last year regarding an inmate who bled to death on Super bowl Sunday. Nothing happened to those officers. You don’t talk – (therefore) you walk.

“To borrow on Judge White’s prediction: the plan is a ruffling of feathers.

“Rehabilitation” has been incorporated in the proposed name change for CDC. But the Governor’s budget proposes slashing $95 million from the CDC budget for drug treatment and the already sparse educational programming. CDC admits that 80 percent of inmates have an addiction problem and 60 percent are functionally illiterate. I believe, as many do, that CDC’s abysmal recidivism rate of more than three out of four could be cut to one in four with literacy remediation and drug addiction treatment programs. But don’t use the name “rehabilitation” while you strike the money that pays for it.

“This is a plan without a price tag.

“This is a plan with ridiculous timelines.

“But let me talk about the part of the plan I fear the most. The California Youth Authority has been a house of horrors in terms of suicides and brutal beatings. We have a large ward population that desperately needs mental health services not just opportunities for basic education. I would advocate that the state of California house and treat our troubled youth in a stand-alone agency that may borrow expertise from the adult correctional agency, but would ultimately be driven by treatment values that are more sensitive to these young, highly troubled lives. In many respects, correctional officers and counselors are faced with more risks and greater treatment challenges at the CYA than at CDC.

“The plan envisions a Division of Youth Operations. I don’t want the problems of the CYA to be tucked away and overshadowed by the demands that come with the incarceration of 164,000 adults.

“We need to look at the successes of the Missouri system where wards called “kids” are treated by guards who are called “youth specialists”. These specialists have college degrees and go by their first name. In California we warehouse wards, but in Missouri, rehabilitation programs are delivered in small settings where bonds are forged between those in need of help and those who provide it. It took a series of scandals in 1983 to get Missouri to reform itself, and the reform has been cost effective. Missouri spends $43,000 per youth per year while the CYA’s tab is in excess of $80,000 per ward, per year.
“Akin to the CYA are the challenges raised by the incarceration of women. I am deeply troubled by ongoing reports of abusive behavior of young female inmates who prey upon frail and elderly cellmates, a dynamic encouraged by a CDC policy that apparently puts the young and the old in the same cell. Women’s health issues abound and I would hope that the proposed Division of Correctional Health Care Services will be set up to focus on the special needs of women.

“Last month, this Commission issued a report on the failures of California’s women’s prison system. The CDC agreed with the commission’s findings regarding rehabilitation failures.

“I say to corrections: make correcting your failures a priority. There should be a separate correctional division set up for women.

“Clearly, one of the past problems at CDC is that the 32 state prisons were independent fiefdoms, and four of them were actually operating in the Dark Ages given that they had no e-mail capabilities. The new plan flattens the organization and, as I said, appears to streamline the flow command and control management. This is a positive step.

“I concur that wardens do not need to be subject to Senate confirmation. They should be skilled Chief Financial Officers, not political appointments approved by the CCPOA.

“However, the plan is faulty on two related fronts. One: the Agency doesn’t expect to have a fully functional technological management system in place for five more years. This means that 280,000 inmates each year will be processed through a system without their tracks appearing in a central database.

Furthermore, a central health care database is also not envisioned until July 2010. That’s not five years away, it’s at least $6 billion to $8 billion or more away – and this is the amount of taxpayer money that will be devoted to inmate health care which is out of control. It is unconscionable to spend this sum of money without appropriate utilization date in place.
“This plan should call for immediate negotiations with the University of California, with HMOs, and with country hospitals, all who can help CDC effectively care for an aging inmate population.
“The plan calls for each new commitment to corrections to be interviewed and assessed regarding his or her rehabilitative, behavior and medical needs*. A few months ago CDC employees at San Quentin told me, as they had the year before, that inmates arrive for release without medical records and with incomplete personnel files. The

* Editor’s Note: The rehabilitation assessment bill proposed in the Legislature to that effect was defeated.

reality is that CDC employs a cumbersome paper-driven system when a central database system is required no – not in 2010. And when governments says ‘in five years’ it often means seven, eight (or even) 10 years.

“Frankly, the system is overloaded, that is, there are too many inmates for all the cells available. The crowding of inmates breeds hostilities and disease while overtaxing custody and health care staff. Parole reform has failed to date.

“When you look at this reorganization plan, you don’t see the troubles of prison culture, you don’t see the ongoing injustices at facilities for women where basic hygiene needs are subject to a degrading barter system. You don’t see the schizophrenics who are routinely sent to the SHU for behavior that warrants treatment at a state mental hospital. But you also don’t see the ongoing results that are occurring at Pelican Bay State Prison, once our most troubled institution, but now, due to intense Federal scrutiny, an institution where correctional staff enjoy going to work, where the code of silence has been hushed and where management is standing strong – and this testimony comes from correctional officers brave enough to share their views.

“I would note that reform at Pelican Bay was driven by the courage of the Honorable Judge Thelton Henderson and Special Master John Hagar. This plan, in many ways, is a byproduct of the Federal court’s intervention at Pelican Bay State Prison, and I would suggest that we may have to consider a federal takeover if the state fails to implement needed reforms at every prison.

“We need the best, the brightest, the most committed to run a $7 billion correctional system. The plan does set up a framework for the best and brightest to excel. But the plan falls short by failing to recognize the urgency of using technology, the urgency of dealing with troubled youth in separate environment and the urgency of funding treatment programs.

“I will be introducing a series of bills that will address shortcomings at CDC and I expect the administration to work with me and my staff to craft amendments to this plan and we should bolster oversight conditions that confront women in prison.

“In closing, I would note that the Commission has done great work on parole reform and on women in prison, and I would ask the Commission to consider holding a follow-up hearing on this reorganization plan, sometime prior to the May Revise of 2005. (In May, the Governor will provide a revised budget proposal for the next fiscal year based on the revenue collections and spending since the Governor’s original budget proposal in January.) I make this request because public oversight of corrections is one element missing from the reorganization, although the establishment of a public oversight commission was a key recommendation of the Governor’s California Performance Review plan prepared by former Governor George Deukmejian. Clearly, our prison operations need more public scrutiny.

“I believe it is critical for California to understand why California annually spends an average of more than $32,000 to house an inmate while Texas, which has more inmates than California, is able to house inmates at a cost of just $16,000 per year. The answer rests with inefficiencies. This plan addresses a few of the problems such as convoluted lines of authority. But overall, the plan fails to recognize the urgency of dealing with the crisis in inmate health care, recidivism, treatment of wards and lack of cost controls.


The New York Times
February 27, 2005
Private Health Care in Jails Can Be a Death Sentence
By PAUL von ZIELBAUER

Brian Tetrault was 44 when he was led into a dim county jail cell in upstate New York in 2001, charged with taking some skis and other items from his ex-wife's home. A former nuclear scientist who had struggled with Parkinson's disease, he began to die almost immediately, and state investigators would later discover why: The jail's medical director had cut off all but a few of the 32 pills he needed each day to quell his tremors.

Over the next 10 days, Mr. Tetrault slid into a stupor, soaked in his own sweat and urine. But he never saw the jail doctor again, and the nurses dismissed him as a faker. After his heart finally stopped, investigators said, correction officers at the Schenectady jail doctored records to make it appear he had been released before he died.

Two months later, Victoria Williams Smith, the mother of a teenage boy, was booked into another upstate jail, in Dutchess County, charged with smuggling drugs to her husband in prison. She, too, had only 10 days to live after she began complaining of chest pains. She phoned friends in desperation: The medical director would not prescribe anything more potent than Bengay or the arthritis medicine she had brought with her, investigators said. A nurse scorned her pleas to be hospitalized as a ploy to get drugs. When at last an ambulance was called, Ms. Smith was on the floor of her cell, shaking from a heart attack that would kill her within the hour. She was 35.

In these two harrowing deaths, state investigators concluded, the culprit was a for-profit corporation, Prison Health Services, that had moved aggressively into New York State in the last decade, winning jail contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars with an enticing sales pitch: Take the messy and expensive job of providing medical care from overmatched government officials, and give it to an experienced nationwide outfit that could recruit doctors, battle lawsuits and keep costs down.

A yearlong examination of Prison Health by The New York Times reveals repeated instances of medical care that has been flawed and sometimes lethal. The company's performance around the nation has provoked criticism from judges and sheriffs, lawsuits from inmates' families and whistle-blowers, and condemnations by federal, state and local authorities. The company has paid millions of dollars in fines and settlements.

In the two deaths, and eight others across upstate New York, state investigators say they kept discovering the same failings: medical staffs trimmed to the bone, doctors underqualified or out of reach, nurses doing tasks beyond their training, prescription drugs withheld, patient records unread and employee misconduct unpunished.

Not surprisingly, Prison Health, which is based outside Nashville, is no longer working in most of those upstate jails. But it is hardly out of work. Despite a tarnished record, Prison Health has sold its promise of lower costs and better care, and become the biggest for-profit company providing medical care in jails and prisons. It has amassed 86 contracts in 28 states, and now cares for 237,000 inmates, or about one in every 10 people behind bars.

Prison Health Services says that any lapses that have occurred are far outnumbered by its successes, and that many cities and states have been pleased with its work. Company executives dispute the state's findings in the upstate deaths, saying their policy is never to deny necessary medical care.

And they say that many complaints - from litigious inmates,
disgruntled employees and overzealous investigators - simply come with the hugely challenging work they have taken on.

"What we do," said Michael Catalano, the company chairman, "is provide a public health service that many others are unable or unwilling to do."

The examination of Prison Health also reveals a company that is very much a creature of a growing phenomenon: the privatization of jail and prison health care. As governments try to shed the burden of soaring medical costs - driven by the exploding problems of AIDS and mental illness among inmates - this field has become a $2 billion-a-year industry.

It is an intensely competitive world populated by a handful of
companies, each striving to find enough doctors and nurses for a demanding and sometimes dangerous job. The companies, overseen by local governments with limited choices and money, regularly move from jail to jail, and scandal to scandal - often disliked but always needed.

Perhaps the most striking example of Prison Health's ability to
prosper amid its set of troubles unfolded in New York State. Despite disappointed customers and official investigations in Florida and Pennsylvania, the company still managed to win its largest contract ever in 2000, when New York City agreed to pay it $254 million over three years to provide care at the correctional labyrinth on Rikers Island.

The city, in fact, just renewed that deal in January for another three years - despite the deaths upstate, and a chorus of criticism over Prison Health's work at Rikers, where employees and government monitors have complained of staff shortages and delays in drugs and treatments for H.I.V. and mental illnesses. A rash of suicides in 2003 prompted a scramble by officials to fill serious gaps in care and oversight.

Along the way, though, Prison Health has acquired at least one
tenacious adversary. The State Commission of Correction, appointed by the governor to investigate every death in jail, has moved over the last several years from polite recommendations to bitter denunciations, frustrated by what it says is the company's refusal to admit and address deadly mistakes.

The commission has faulted company policies, or mistakes and
misconduct by its employees, in 23 deaths of inmates in the city and six upstate counties. Fifteen times in the last four years, it has recommended that the state discipline Prison Health doctors and nurses.

And since 2001, the commission, along with the State Education
Department, which regulates the practice of medicine, has urged Attorney General Eliot Spitzer to halt the company's operations in New York, saying that Prison Health lacks any legal authority to practice medicine because business executives are in charge. New York, like many other states, requires that for-profit corporations providing medical services be owned and controlled by doctors, to keep business calculations from driving medical decisions.

Prison Health says its work in New York is legal because it has set up two corporations headed by doctors to run medical care. But state investigators have called those corporations shams.

Elsewhere, Prison Health did not go that far, until questioned by The Times. Now it says it is creating doctor-run corporations in 11 other states with similar laws, including New Jersey and California.

"Had we realized this would be a question, we would have addressed it earlier," said Mr. Catalano, the company's chairman. "We have nothing to hide here."

But in one report after another, the state commission has exposed what it says is the dangerous way Prison Health has operated.

One investigation found that the doctor overseeing care in several upstate jails in 2001 - continually overruling the doctors there, and refusing drugs and treatments - was not even licensed to practice in New York State. He did the job, the commission found, by telephone - from Washington.

The commission's gravest findings have involved deaths on the
company's watch, mostly of people who had not been convicted of anything.

Candy Brown, a 46-year-old Rochester woman jailed in 2000 on a parole violation, died when her withdrawal from heroin went untreated for two days as she lay in her own vomit and excrement in the Monroe County Jail, moaning and crying for help. But nurses did not call a doctor or even clean her off, investigators said. Her fellow inmates took pity and washed her face; some guards took it on themselves to ease her into a shower and a final change of clothes.

Scott Mayo Jr. was only a few minutes old in 2001 when guards fished him out of a toilet in the maternity unit of Albany County Jail. It was the guards, investigators said, who found a faint pulse in the premature baby and worked fiercely to keep his heart beating as a nurse stood by, offering little help.

"We're a jail," the nurse told state officials after the infant died. "There's no equipment for a fetus. Or a newborn."

In at least one death report, the commission took the opportunity to voice a broad indictment of the company. Frederick C. Lamy, chairman of the commission's medical review board, denounced Prison Health, or P.H.S. as it widely known, as "reckless and unprincipled in its corporate pursuits, irrespective of patient care."

"The lack of credentials, lack of training, shocking incompetence and outright misconduct" of the doctors and nurses in the case was "emblematic of P.H.S. Inc.'s conduct as a business corporation, holding itself out as a medical care provider while seemingly bereft of any quality control."

In its review of Prison Health's work, The Times interviewed
government regulators, law enforcement officials and legal and medical specialists, including current and former company employees. The review included thousands of pages of public and internal company documents, state and city records, and every New York State report on deaths under the company's care.

The examination shows that in many parts of the country, including counties in New Jersey and Florida, Prison Health has become a mainstay, satisfying officials by paring expenses and marshaling medical staffs without the rules and union issues that constrain government efforts.

But elsewhere, it has hopscotched from place to place, largely
unscathed by accusations that in cutting costs, it has cut corners.

Georgia, which hired Prison Health in 1995, replaced the company two years later, complaining that it had understaffed prison clinics. Similar complaints led Maine to end its contract in 2003. In Alabama, one prison has only two doctors for more than 2,200 prisoners; one AIDS specialist, before she left this month, called staffing "skeletal" and said she sometimes lacked even soap to wash her hands between treating patients.

In Philadelphia's jails, state and federal court monitors in the late 1990's told of potentially dangerous delays and gaps in treatment and medication for inmates under Prison Health, which nonetheless went on in 2000 to win a contract not far away in the Baltimore City Detention Center. There, two years later, the federal Department of Justice reported that better care might have prevented four inmate deaths. One guard, it said, complained that she had to fight nurses to get sick inmates examined.

Such stories can be heard around the country. In Las Vegas, after an H.I.V.-positive inmate died in 2002, nurses and public defenders said the county jail's medical director had refused medications for AIDS and mental illness, calling inmates junkies.

In Indiana, Barbara Logan, a former Prison Health administrator who filed a whistleblower suit last year, said in an interview that the pharmacy at her state prison was so poorly stocked that nurses often had to run out to CVS to refill routine prescriptions for diabetes and high blood pressure.

Before Prison Health even started in Georgia, there had been several inmate deaths in neighboring Florida that cost the company three county contracts, millions of dollars in settlements - and an apology for its part in the 1994 death of 46-year-old Diane Nelson. Jailed in Pinellas County on charges that she had slapped her teenage daughter, Ms. Nelson suffered a heart attack after nurses failed for two days to order the heart medication her private doctor had prescribed. As she collapsed, a nurse told her, "Stop the theatrics."

The same nurse, in a deposition, also admitted that she had joked to the jail staff, "We save money because we skip the ambulance and bring them right to the morgue."

A Tough Business

Taking On Headaches,

And Creating Some, Too

Few jobs are harder to get right than tending to the health of
inmates, who are sicker and more dependent on alcohol and drugs than people outside. AIDS and hepatitis have torn through cellblocks, and mental illness is a mushrooming problem. In the last decade, state and local government spending for inmate health care has tripled nationwide, to roughly $5 billion a year.

Qualified doctors and nurses are difficult to find, as jails are
hardly the most prestigious or best-paying places to work. The
potential costs of failure, though, are high - because most inmates will eventually be let out, along with any disease or mental illness that went untreated.

For decades the task fell to state and local governments that
typically lacked resources or expertise, acting in sometimes
conflicting roles as punisher and medical protector. Often, the
results were tragic.

Three skeletons dug up at an Arkansas penal farm in 1968 led to the uncovering of a monstrous system in which a prison hospital served as torture chamber and a doctor as chief tormentor. The 1971 uprising at Attica state prison in upstate New York, which was sparked in part by complaints about health care, left 43 inmates and guards dead. The debacle unleashed a flood of prisoner lawsuits that culminated in a
1976 United States Supreme Court decision declaring that governments must provide adequate medical care in jails and prisons.

But where governments saw a burden, others spotted an opportunity. Two years after the ruling, a Delaware nurse named Doyle Moore founded Prison Health, pioneering a for-profit medical-care industry that offered local officials a grand solution: hand off the headache.

About 40 percent of all inmate medical care in America is now
contracted to for-profit companies, led by Prison Health, its closest rival, Correctional Medical Services, and four or five others. Though the remaining 60 percent of inmate care is still supplied by governments, most often by their Health Departments, that number has been shrinking as medical expenses soar.

A few big-city hospitals and other nonprofit enterprises have stepped into the fray, and while not perfect themselves, have performed the best by many accounts, bringing a sense of mission to the work. But that care usually costs more than governments want to spend, and most hospitals are neither equipped nor motivated to enter a jail or prison, where profit margins linger in the single digits.

In this world, where governments are limited in their choices, a
half-dozen for-profit companies jockey to underbid each other and promise the biggest savings.

"It's almost like a game of attrition, where the companies will take bids for amounts that you just can't do it," said Dr. Michael Puisis, a national expert and editor of "Clinical Practice in Correctional Medicine," an anthology of articles by doctors. "They figure out how to make money after they get the contract."

Businesses with the most dubious track records can survive, and thrive. When cost-trimming cuts into the quality of care, harming inmates and prompting lawsuits and investigations, governments often see no alternatives but to keep the company, or hire another, then another when that one fails - a revolving-door process that sometimes ends with governments rehiring the company they fired years earlier.

Prison Health has mastered the game. When its mistakes have become public, the company has quietly settled lawsuits and nimbly brokered its exits by quickly resigning, thus preserving its marketable claim that it has never been let go for cause.

Even dissatisfied government clients can be reluctant to discuss their complaints openly, or share them with other counties or states. Some fear being exposed to lawsuits and criticism; others worry that the company dropped this year may return next year as the only bidder for the job. Or, as some former Prison Health customers discovered to their dismay, the new company they hire may be bought by the company they fired.

"You've got the professionals dealing with amateurs," said Dr. Ronald Shansky, a former medical director for the Illinois prison system. He said most sheriffs and jailers were not sophisticated enough about medicine to know what to demand for their money until things go wrong. Local laws requiring that contracts be regularly put out for bid - and go to the lowest bidder - can force officials to switch providers constantly, disrupting care and demoralizing staffs.

Yet once they turn jail medicine over to an outside enterprise,
governments rarely go back to providing it themselves. "It's like an article of faith that private is better," Dr. Shansky said, even though a 1997 study comparing government and for-profit prison care, commissioned by the Michigan Department of Corrections, found little difference in cost or quality.

On this playing field, Prison Health has prevailed by thinking big, buying up competitors and creating a nationwide pharmacy to supply its operations. Its revenues have risen in the last decade to an estimated $690 million last year from $110 million in 1994, and its stock has leapt to $27.46 a share - its closing price on Friday - from a split-adjusted price of $3.33.

But day by day, Prison Health - like all of its competitors - faces
the most basic challenge: finding people to do the job. For openings in Philadelphia last year, it advertised on a Web page called the Job Resource. "Psychiatrists - Feel shackled to an unsatisfying job? Discover correctional medicine!" said one ad. A Las Vegas posting urged, "Come do some time with us!"

Those who Prison Health hires wind up responsible for the legion of people locked up every day. When the doors shut behind them, the care those prisoners get is shuttered from public view. Deaths behind bars provoke scant outcry.

But if the public has little information about inmates, and not much inclination to care, it may have even less sympathy for the notion that they should die for want of medical attention.

Cutting a Lifeline

For Parkinson's Patient,

A Countdown to Death

Four days into his stay at the Schenectady County Jail, it all began to come apart for Brian Richard Tetrault. He could no longer walk the four steps from his bunk to the door of Cell 22, in A-block, where a nurse was waiting with his small ration of pills.

Since his arrest, the state commission said, he had been denied most of the medication he had used for a decade to control his Parkinson's disease and psychological problems. The medical staff knew about his ailments from the day he arrived, soft-spoken and clutching a plastic pill organizer; they even phoned his doctor for his charts.

But the jail's medical director took him off all but two of his seven medications, and nurses concluded that the new inmate was more uncooperative than ill, state investigators said. Mr. Tetrault, a former nuclear scientist at the nearby Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, had only seven days left before an agonizing death that investigators would label "physician induced."

He had grown up in the Albany suburbs, a hunter and amateur mechanic with a gift for mathematics. He joined the Navy, and spent a year on classified missions in a nuclear submarine. By 1990, he had a wife and two sons, a house on a lake and his pick of good-paying jobs in nuclear engineering.

But try as he did to ignore its slow trespass, Parkinson's ruined
everything. His sister Barbara first noticed how his hand shook during a game of pinochle. By 1995, Mr. Tetrault was popping prescription Sinemet tablets every two hours to counter the loss of dopamine, a brain chemical vital to muscle function. Every day became a battle with dyskinesia, the drug-induced tremors common to Parkinson's patients.

"He'd call it 'disky,' " said Larry Broderick, a high school friend. "He'd say, 'I'm getting disky.' "

By 2001, the disease had destroyed Mr. Tetrault's marriage and estranged his two teenage sons. His ex-wife, Eileen, had obtained an order of protection as he grew increasingly depressed and angry. That Nov. 10, he stormed into her home while she was away and snatched some items - skis and a push broom - before the police arrived and charged him with burglary and harassment.

His mistreatment began that day, according to the state commission. Without seeing Mr. Tetrault, the jail's medical director, Dr. W. J. Duke Dufresne, prescribed Sinemet and an anti-ulcer drug, but none of the other five medications for his Parkinson's, pain and psychiatric troubles.

On his second day in jail, Mr. Tetrault saw Dr. Dufresne, the only physician for the jail's 300 or so inmates. In a brief visit, the commission said, the doctor reduced even the Sinemet. As for the mental health drugs, Dr. Dufresne later told investigators that only a psychiatrist should prescribe them.

But no one ever arranged for Mr. Tetrault to see the jail
psychiatrist, the commission said. And never again did he see Dr. Dufresne, who told investigators he had believed that Mr. Tetrault was merely feeling the typical ups and downs of Parkinson's; he had planned to check on him in three months.

Mr. Tetrault had only days. On his fourth day in jail, medical records show, he grew increasingly "disky" and belligerent, as his body withdrew from the medications that had sustained him for years. On the sixth day, he lay in his bunk, steeped in his own urine and unable to move. "Continues to be manipulative," a nurse wrote.

On the seventh day, the commission said, nurses continued to look in on him, chronicle his deterioration and do little about it. "Inmate remains very stiff," one wrote. "Head arched back, sweating profusely," another noted. A third nurse forced him to walk to the jail clinic, though he could barely move.

On the eighth day, alerted by a nurse's phone call, Dr. Dufresne
ordered Mr. Tetrault hospitalized. At Ellis Hospital in Schenectady, emergency-room doctors diagnosed the ravages of his untreated Parkinson's. "I suspect, in the prison setting, he was not getting his full dose of medication as needed," wrote Dr. Richard B. Brooks.

There was not much the hospital could do. On the 10th day, Mr.
Tetrault went into septic shock. On the 11th, he died.

The state commission ultimately referred Dr. Dufresne to the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct for what it alleged was "grossly inadequate" care, urged Prison Health to fire him and asked the county to fire Prison Health.

The commission found that Dr. Dufresne had never given Mr. Tetrault a physical examination; and nurses had transcribed the doctor's orders incorrectly, reducing even the Sinemet.

The medical conduct board has taken no action against Dr. Dufresne. The company, in its lawyer's response to the commission, disputed virtually all of the commission's findings, saying that Mr. Tetrault sometimes resisted taking his medication, and that he was well able to move when he wanted. The company's internal one-page review of Mr. Tetrault's care passed no judgment on the doctor or the nurses. But it did recommend six minor changes, like keeping medical records in
chronological order. Dr. Dufresne, who is now the company's regional medical director for upstate jails, did not return calls seeking comment.

Richard D. Wright, the president and chief executive of Prison Health, would not discuss details of the case, citing a lawsuit by Mr. Tetrault's son Zachary. He said that over all, Schenectady County "was extremely pleased with the work of the company."

But the county moved to fire Prison Health the day after the
commission's report was made public last June. "We were going to terminate them for cause," said Chris Gardner, the county attorney. "But they approached us and we mutually agreed to terminate the relationship."

The humiliation of Mr. Tetrault did not end with his passing, or with Prison Health, the commission said. On the day he died, Nov. 20, 2001, sheriff's officials altered records to change the time of his release from custody, in the early evening, to 2:45 p.m. - 10 minutes before he was pronounced dead, the commission said. The Sheriff's Department denied the charge, and said it had done nothing untoward in trying to formally release Mr. Tetrault.

But the commission said the time change allowed the department to avoid an investigation, at least for a while. Commissioners learned of Mr. Tetrault's death by reading a newspaper article about Zachary's lawsuit, 20 months later.

The Revolving Door

After Trouble in Florida,

Moving On, and Up

If Schenectady County was learning hard lessons about Prison Health, it was old news in South Florida, where several counties had tangled, and re-tangled, with the company years earlier.

By the time Pinellas County hired Prison Health in 1992, the company was hitting its stride. Fourteen years after its founding, it had established a wide beachhead in the state, and had just begun a nationwide push that by the end of the decade would put it in the three biggest cities of the Northeast and the prison systems of entire states. A year earlier, the company began selling stock under the name of a holding company, America Service Group.

But for Pinellas, halfway down Florida's Gulf Coast, things wer headed downhill.

Everett S. Rice, who was sheriff then, said that Prison Health
understaffed the county jail in Clearwater. The company seemed reluctant, he said, to send seriously ill inmates to hospitals, which could cost it thousands of dollars a day. Inmates were regularly showing up in court incompetent to stand trial, said Bob Dillinger, the county public defender, because they were not getting their psychiatric medicines.

The sheriff's office learned that even the most basic care had to be spelled out in the contract. When one inmate died after a delay in calling for help, Mr. Rice said, the agreement was rewritten to require that Prison Health call 911 at a specific time after the start of a medical emergency.

Then, in March 1994, came the death of Diane Nelson, who collapsed of a heart attack in front of the nurse whose words would echo in news reports: "We save money because we skip the ambulance."

Saving money was the reason the county had hired Prison Health. Pinellas was actually on its second round with the company, having first enlisted it in 1986 because of worries about the ballooning costs of the county's own jail health care. When the contract went back out for bid three years later, Pinellas switched to a cheaper competitor; three years after that, Prison Health bid the lowest and retook the job.

But Mr. Rice said the bidding process never turned up a whisper of criticism about Prison Health, or any of its competitors. "Every time we'd be up for renewal, we'd talk to the other counties and institutions, and surprisingly, most of them had glowing reports," he said.

In the end, the deal with Prison Health "probably saved a little
money," Mr. Rice said, but the human and political costs were too high. "I thought if I'm going to get the blame for this, I'm going to bring it back inside," he said.

The county did that in April 1995, going back into the business of jail medical care. Three months later, an hour's drive to the east, rural Polk County - which had hired Prison Health the same year as Pinellas - broke off with the company after three inmate deaths that cost Polk taxpayers thousands of dollars in settlements.

"There were instances where we would actually send somebody to the hospital by ambulance because P.H.S. wouldn't do so," said David Bergdoll, counsel to the Polk County Sheriff's office.

Since 1992, at least 15 inmates have died in 11 Florida jails in cases where Prison Health appears to have provided inadequate care, according to documents and interviews with state and county officials.

As it grew, Prison Health proved adept at ingratiating itself with
local politicians, hiring lobbyists and contributing to campaigns for sheriff. Under a promise of immunity from prosecution, the nurse who founded the company, Mr. Moore, testified at a 1993 Florida corruption trial that he had paid the Broward County Republican chairman $5,000 a month - "basically extortion," he said - to keep the contract there and in neighboring Palm Beach County.

Some counties say Prison Health has done good work and saved taxpayers money. In Tampa, the medical bill at the Hillsborough County Jail fell to $1.2 million, from $1.8 million in 1982, the year Prison Health replaced the county's medical operation, said Col. David M. Parrish, who runs the jail.

There have been other costs. Last year, the company dismissed a nurse and reprimanded two others after an inmate's baby died; the mother, Kimberly Grey, said in a federal lawsuit that although she had been leaking amniotic fluid for five days, nurses refused to examine her until she gave birth over a cell toilet.

But Colonel Parrish said that mistakes, and second-guessing, were part of the job, no matter who does it. "Anybody who is in the health care business for inmates is going to get blasted because inmates have nothing better to do than complain and sue and find somebody who is going to make a big stink about nothing," he said.

Certainly, a litany of complaints followed as Prison Health expanded across the nation. In Philadelphia, a 1999 federal court monitor's report warned that the company's failure to segregate inmates who were suffering from tuberculosis posed "a public health emergency." Pregnant inmates, it said, were not routinely tested or counseled for H.I.V., endangering their babies.

Dr. Robert Cohen, a state court monitor, said in an interview that Philadelphia doctors "actually encouraged women to refuse pelvic examinations."

Prison Health still works in Philadelphia, where officials have persistently prodded it to improve care. Like many governments, the city has moved from a fixed-cost contract in which the company's profit comes out of whatever it does not spend to one that covers most medical costs and pays Prison Health a management fee.

When other governments have shown less patience, Prison Health has survived, and even grown, by buying rivals like Correctional Health Services, of Verona, N.J. In 1999, its biggest purchase, EMSA Government Services, brought with it contracts with dozens of prisons and jails.

Back in Florida, the purchase brought some unwelcome déjà vu to Polk County, which thought it was through with Prison Health when it hired EMSA. When Prison Health bought EMSA, Polk officials soon replaced it yet again.

"P.H.S. was the lowest bidder, but we didn't accept their bid," said Mr. Bergdoll, the sheriff's counsel. "That should tell you something." Since then, he said, the number of lawsuits has fallen so sharply that the county's insurer lowered its premiums.

The EMSA purchase also brought Prison Health back to Broward County, Fla., which had dropped it years earlier because it had been unhappy with the medical care. Two years after its return, three state judges noticed the phenomenon that had played out in Pinellas - a parade of inmates showing up in court incoherent - and ordered the company to stop withholding psychiatric drugs.

"My impression was that it was money," Judge Susan Lebow said in an interview. "The doctors were under corporate direction to not continue the medications."

Prison Health denies it gave any such order. The Broward sheriff would not comment on the company, which the county replaced again in 2001.

But the revolving door of for-profit health care spins on. Last December, Broward hired Armor Correctional Health Services, a company formed just a few weeks earlier by a familiar figure: Doyle Moore, the nurse who founded Prison Health.

A Jailhouse Birth

Chaos on a Cell Floor

As a Baby Is Discovered

It could not have been much worse. A newborn baby lay in a pool of blood on the floor of the Albany County Jail. At least four adults were there: the mother, a registered nurse and two correction officers who struggled to save the tiny boy. But the nurse looked on passively, tending to the dazed mother, convinced that little could be done, state records show.

The baby, who was named Scott Mayo Jr., died two days later.

The mistreatment and missed chances to help the young mother, Aja Venny, began soon after her arrival 11 days earlier, investigators said. A 22-year-old secretary and community-college student from the Bronx, she knew she had done something stupid: taken a ride with a drug dealer she knew from her neighborhood. When a state trooper pulled them over, she stuffed his small bags of drugs into her bra.

She was booked into jail on Aug. 30, 2001, nearly six months pregnant.

The medical staff made an appointment with an obstetrician it paid to visit every two weeks, but Ms. Venny never saw him, state investigators said; nurses ordered her files from a Bronx women's clinic, but never received them. The one concession to her condition, it seems, was her assignment to the maternity unit, a six-bunk cell with a toilet cordoned off by a white curtain.

On Sept. 9, Ms. Venny awoke before dawn with excruciating cramps. Another inmate told the guard that Ms. Venny was about to give birth. After two calls to the nursing supervisor, Donna Hunt, a jail sergeant sent an officer to fetch her immediately.

When she arrived at 7:15 a.m., Ms. Hunt found Ms. Venny sitting on the toilet crying and "blood everywhere," she told investigators. She cleaned off and consoled the inmate, and told the officers to call an ambulance. She said later that she assumed that Ms. Venny had miscarried and saw no reason to check the toilet.

But ambulance technicians, on the phone with the sergeant, asked if there was a baby. Guards looked in the toilet and discovered the infant, still in his placental sac. Officer Dave Verrelli scooped him out using a red biohazard waste bag and laid him on a towel on the cell floor as Nurse Hunt watched.

"I knew that there was probably nothing we could do for this fetus," she told investigators.

Officer Verrelli detected a slight pulse. "What should I do now?" he frantically asked the nurse, who told him to cut open the sac. Officer Verrelli cut it, removed the baby and uncoiled the umbilical cord from its neck. Ms. Hunt confirmed that there was a faint heartbeat, investigators said, but did nothing to get the baby breathing in the quarter-hour before ambulance workers arrived and administered oxygen.

At the hospital, the boy was placed on a ventilator, his heart pumping but his temperature too low to be measured. On his third day of life, he died.

The State Board of Regents found that three Prison Health nurses, including Ms. Hunt, had failed to care properly for Ms. Venny or her baby. Each nurse was placed on a year's probation and fined $500. The State Commission of Correction did not say whether anyone might have saved the child, but it emphasized that Ms. Hunt did not take basic steps to help. She did not return calls seeking comment.

The commission also found more deep-seated failures: a disorganized staff and prenatal training for nurses that consisted of e-mail messages with instructions copied from a university Web site.

Prison Health's lawyers defended Nurse Hunt - saying she found the child in the toilet, but was pushed aside by guards - and accused the commission of ignoring "inconvenient facts."

Ms. Venny, who completed a six-month boot-camp prison program after her son's death, now lives in the Bronx with her husband, Scott, and their 20-month-old daughter, Skye. The ashes of Scott Jr. are kept in a golden urn in the bedroom.

"I know what I was doing was wrong," she said. But still, "I can't find a reason why a baby had to die."

Connecting the Deaths

A Pattern Emerges,

And a Battle Begins

It was late 2000 when state investigators began to notice something strange. Reviewing deaths that had occurred in jails in upstate New York, they were not struck by the number or even the grim details of the cases, which they routinely examined as employees of the State Commission of Correction. Something else was wrong.

Working out of a cluttered office in Albany, the three commissioners and a six-member medical review board noticed that low-level employees were doing work normally done by better-credentialed people. Nurses without the proper qualifications, they said, were making medical decisions and pronouncing patients dead.

In Rochester, where Candy Brown had died that September, pleading for help as she withdrew from heroin, investigators found that one of the nurses responsible for her had been suspended by the state three times for negligent care.

In that case and others, commission members said, the people offering the most help and compassion were guards and inmates. And the company, it turned out, was always the same: Prison Health.

"Our sense was that what we were dealing with was not clinical
problems but business practices," said James E. Lawrence, the
commission's director of operations.

It was the start of a long fight to get the company to change its
ways, and when that failed, to get other officials in Albany to step in. Four years later, the commission has been stymied on both fronts.

Mr. Lawrence said Prison Health seemed unfamiliar with New York's tradition of regulated health care, "and dismissive of it." When the agency sought out those in charge, it would often be routed to lawyers or executives at the company's headquarters in Brentwood, Tenn., who bristled at the suggestion that they were answerable to New York State regulators. "The rules were not of any consequence," Mr. Lawrence said.

Prison Health entered New York in 1985 as medical provider for the Dutchess County Jail. Orange and Broome Counties hired the company for a few years, but ended those contracts in the 1990's.

By late 2000, when the company began to attract the state commission's notice, it had signed contracts with Schenectady, Ulster, Monroe and Albany Counties. The Albany jail superintendent at the time called the company "a godsend."

The commission called it a disaster. "Grossly and flagrantly
inadequate," for instance, was its verdict on the care given Candy Brown.

Prison Health, in turn, challenged the commission's authority, and even sued over its report on one inmate's treatment, saying the panel had acted maliciously. The suit was dismissed on its merits.

Dr. Carl J. Keldie, the corporation's medical director, said the
commission seemed to make up its mind before an investigation and then overstate its case in reports. "The tone, the timbre, the language is egregious," he said. Company executives said the commission has refused to meet and try to reconcile their differences.

The commission in 2001 moved beyond the specific criticisms in its reports to sound a general alarm. Asking state education officials to investigate, it said Prison Health was allowing "dangerously substandard medicine" by hiring doctors and nurses with questionable credentials.

A month later, spurred by the commission, the Department of Education alerted the state attorney general that the company was operating illegally in New York by not having doctors in charge of medical care. "Nobody really noticed that they weren't licensed," one commissiondoctor said of Prison Health's presence in New York.

In the three years since, nothing has come of either complaint. The only agency with the power to enforce the state law - the attorney general's office - finally replied last October, telling the commission to resolve the matter on its own. In a heated exchange of letters, an assistant attorney general, Ronda C. Lustman, scolded the commission for refusing to meet with executives.

The company says that it is acting legally because it has set up local corporations with doctors in charge. But there is abundant evidence, state investigators say, that those corporations are shams.

For example, Dr. Trevor Parks is listed as the sole shareholder of P.H.S. Medical Services P.C., which the company says provides all medical care at Rikers Island, free of any influence from Prison Health executives. But investigators say that when they interviewed him, he had little idea of his role, or his corporation's.

Moreover, records show that Dr. Parks's corporation went out of business in July, for nonpayment of taxes and fees. After The Times pointed that out to company executives in December, Prison Health paid the money. Dr. Parks did not respond to phone calls and e-mail messages.

If frustration mounted at the commission, a sense of impending trouble was growing at the jail in Albany County, where the commission said doctors' decisions on inmate treatment were being overruled by a regional medical director in Washington who was not licensed to practice in New York.

The doctor, Akin Ayeni, said in an interview that he never overruled any doctor there. But a former medical director at the jail said she quit in April 2001 because she felt the company's policies, and Dr. Ayeni's decisions, were dangerous.

"I told my staff, 'I know it's only a matter of time before they kill someone,' " she said, asking that her name not be used because she feared retribution. "I knew there was going to be a death. I could feel it."

In the six months after she left, two people died and a third was
seriously injured after poor treatment by Prison Health, the state commission found; the dead included Aja Venny's newborn son.

The county and the company parted ways six months later, said Thomas J. Wigger, the jail superintendent, because he was unsatisfied with the quality of care.

One by one, other counties have followed suit. Ulster County, for example, caught Prison Health overbilling it for thousands of dollars of nurse hours and switched to another company in 2001. The company, for its part, said it lost most of the upstate contracts to competitors who had underbid them. Strangely, it said it had no record of working in Orange County, even though the state commission faulted the company in two inmate deaths, in 1989 and 1990.

Last October, Schenectady County dropped Prison Health after the death of Mr. Tetrault, the inmate with Parkinson's disease. The jail director, Maj. Robert Elwell, said in an interview that the medicaldirector, Dr. Dufresne, had discouraged treatment for anything but the most urgent problems. "When you're dealing with a for-profit corporation, those are the types of decisions that get made," Major Elwell said.

The company's only remaining outpost in upstate New York is Dutchess County. "I believe they are a good company," said David W. Rugar, the county jail administrator. "It's just an intense thing to do, when you provide medical services."

Indeed, just days before it renewed its deal with Prison Health in 2002, the jail had an intense experience that would cost the company's medical director there his job.

Cries From the Heart

Despite Days of Agony,

'No Body Will Help Me'

When they cleaned out Cell 6 in Unit 10 on Feb. 16, 2002, workers at the Dutchess County Jail found a letter that Victoria Williams Smith had written to her husband.

"My chest is tight & burns, my arms are numb," it said. "I been to the nurse about five times & no body will help me. I need to get out of this jail. It feels like I'm having a stroke, no bull."

Actually, it was a heart attack, and it had killed Ms. Smith a few
hours earlier at the age of 35. The letter was just one in a skein of increasingly panicked pleas for help during her last 10 days in jail.

Ms. Smith was born in Brooklyn, but settled in North Carolina with her second husband, Justin Smith. They married in 1997, shortly after he was sent to a prison in Dutchess County for attempted robbery.

She shipped him canned food that he could sell for cash, and in
January 2002 drove to the prison for what friends said was a visit allowed to married couples.

The reunion was called off by state troopers, who were waiting at the prison to search her. They found about seven ounces of heroin clearly intended for her husband to use or sell, state records show.

Thirteen days passed, state investigators said, before Ms. Smith was examined by a doctor: Vidyadhara A. Kagali, the part-time medical director at the jail in Poughkeepsie, who worked only on Wednesday and Friday evenings even though he was responsible for about 300 inmates.

She could have hoped for better. Dr. Kagali, who was board certified only as a pathologist, had never treated patients in a hospital and had "limited knowledge of his responsibilities as jail medical director," according to commission records.

On Feb. 6, when she began to complain of chest pains and numbness, Dr. Kagali told her she was suffering from inflamed cartilage in her chest, and had her continue taking the Vioxx arthritis medication that friends in North Carolina mailed to her.

The next day, after Ms. Smith was found crying in pain in her cell, an electrocardiogram revealed abnormalities in her heart. But Dr. Kagali, notified by a nurse, did not see her, according to the state commission. On her third day in jail, records show, a second EKG showed the same heart problem, but the doctor still did not see her.

On the seventh day, a nurse turned to the jail's part-time
psychiatrist for help in easing Ms. Smith's chest pain and labored breathing. Without seeing her, he prescribed a drug for intestinal problems. On the eighth day, Dr. Kagali saw Ms. Smith; he ordered a spinal X-ray and recommended Bengay.

Two days later, in tears, she phoned her North Carolina friends, Chris and Marjorie Bowers, three times. "She said these people would not help her at all," Ms. Bowers said.

In the early morning of Feb. 16, Ms. Smith's untreated heart ailment became an emergency, according to jail records and sworn statements from nurses and guards. Around 4:30 a.m., a guard found her rocking on her bunk, clutching her chest, and called Barbara Light, the registered nurse on duty.

Ms. Light concluded that Ms. Smith was having an anxiety attack - even though, the commission said, the nurse had never seen the inmate's medical record.

A half-hour later, Ms. Smith, weeping, told the guard she wanted to go to a hospital - a plea Nurse Light dismissed as an attempt to get drugs. Minutes after that, the guard placed a frantic third call to the nurse, who arrived to find the inmate on the floor, shaking. An ambulance rushed Ms. Smith to Vassar Brothers Medical Center, where she died in less than an hour.

The state commission, in its report, seemed hardly to know where to begin to catalog the failures.

It urged that Dr. Kagali be fired for "gross incompetence," and
referred Ms. Light to state regulators for discipline. State health authorities eventually suspended the doctor's license for six months, but have not taken action against Ms. Light. Neither she nor Dr. Kagali would comment.

The company's confidential review of Ms. Smith's death found no fault with her treatment, but recommended that its staff offer grief counseling to colleagues and inmates after future jail deaths.

In a letter to the commission, Prison Health defended Ms. Light and Dr. Kagali. It said that over Ms. Smith's five weeks in jail the doctor had seen her numerous times and provided medications, knee braces and even an extra mattress for her arthritis. Ms. Smith had no known history of heart disease, the company said, and any suggestion that her death could have been prevented was "20-20 hindsight."

The letter was signed by Dr. Dufresne, whom the commission would later blame for Brian Tetrault's death.

Joseph Plambeck contributed reporting for this article.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company |


2006 Features | 2005 Features | More 2005 | Last 2005 | 2004 Features